Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 7:10 am
The Theater #1 Seems like a done in one story with some ongoing horror theme. I dug it and if you are fan of viruses, zombies and The Road you might enjoy it as well.
This is the forum for ComicBookPage.com.
http://comicbookpage.com./forum/
Fair enough. This kind of thing (to a different scale) is why I ultimately dropped Crossed.spid wrote: I can't say I disagree with anything you said, but at the end of the book I felt down. The unrelenting oppression just left me with a bad taste in my mouth. I might pick this up in trade, but I am not sure I am monthly dose of this kind of world.
Jim Shooter reviews USM #1 in GREAT detail. He agrees with me:BobBretall wrote:I picked one up @ the LCS to see what all the fuzz was about. Typical Bendis....VEEEERY decompressed story-telling. Good for what it is, but I'm getting weary of Bendis' pace of storytelling.Frank Castle wrote:Ult Spider-Man vol 2
In the end, it comes down to preference, just like with art.So what do we have here?
A bushel of coincidences that would make Thomas Hardy blush.
A series of unlikely events, many related to the movements of spider 42.
A pile of people and things introduced or mentioned that are irrelevant to the issue in hand.
More items devoid of meaning and questions unanswered in the episode in question than one would ever encounter in any professionally written TV show. Even the worst.
A bunch of Lego blocks—not a very big bunch—spilled out onto a table that, with the addition of many, many more blocks might someday become a cute little choo-choo or something. Not enough blocks here even for the cow catcher, though. It’s going to take a lot more blocks. This thing is the decompression gold medal winner. Three pages to get the kid accepted at a high school by random drawing? Which has precious little bearing on whatever the Hell is going on? Three? Of 21? Really?
In this case, I'm one of them. I initially hated the idea of a new Spider-Man, but after reading two issues I like it a lot. I think devoting 3 pages to that, as you said, helped establish personalities and let you soak everything in before the action comes, just like the original Ultimate Spider-Man ... he didn't put the mask on until what, #4 or 5?BobBretall wrote: Some are going to like the more expansive attention to minutiae about the characters helping to establish their personalities and doing a slow roll to play this out over 6 issues.
Yes, you're correct. It was the beginning of the long slide into decompressed storytelling as the standard in the industry.abysslord wrote: just like the original Ultimate Spider-Man ... he didn't put the mask on until what, #4 or 5?
Agreed. A good example of this for me was the beginning of Invincible. It had action, and started to explain the backstory in little bits, which was spread out amongst many issues. I remember reading Invincible #1 and thinking, "wow, what a fantastic first issue".BobBretall wrote:Personally, I'd like to see a #1 that gets right to the action, then reveal the background info as interstitial scenes over the course of the next 10 action-packed issues.
The Robotman story made this a 5/5 for me. Awesome take on Robotman.BobBretall wrote:My Greatest Adventure #1 - 5/5 - A great follow-on to Weird Worlds. Really fresh take on Robotman, appears to be set in the future. Garbage Man & Tanga are superb, as they were in Weird Worlds. Maguire's Tanga is the star of the book for me, though. I love the widescreen panels.
Did you read #0? I don't know if that would have helped, but I enjoyed #0 and #1 as well. For myself, I thought the religious stuff wasn't too heavy and I like the premise. So you're right, it worked for someone who's interests were differentIanG wrote:Haunted City #1 (Aspen) - The story while not bad just didn't interest me. It's all about different religous references commingling and it didn't work for me. Also the story was really choppy and a bit hard to follow. The art was pretty good as it usually is with Aspen. While this didn't work me it may work for someone else who's interests are different.
I tend to skip zero issues and wait for the #1. I don't have a good reason for not getting zero issues. I get the premise of the comic but I didn't understand enough about the players within that story. It was certainly not a bad comic and I'm not suprised that someone else enjoyed it. That's why I like to read other people's opinions on this forum.abysslord wrote:Did you read #0? I don't know if that would have helped, but I enjoyed #0 and #1 as well. For myself, I thought the religious stuff wasn't too heavy and I like the premise. So you're right, it worked for someone who's interests were different
To continue the Pilot Season analogy this book felt like the first 30 minutes of an hour long show.BobBretall wrote:While I like Rahsan's art, and Josh's setup, I didn't like this as a Pilot Season book.Frank Castle wrote:The Test - I'm a little bias as Rahsan is my boy but I friggin loved this Pilot issue. I'm going to vote for it as many times as I can and I hope there is more to come.
It was all set-up and tease. It's bad enough when I get that in a book that is part one of a 4 or 6 part story arc. It's unacceptable to me in a Pilot Season book where I have no guarantee that I'll ever see #2.
Heck, Genius won a few years ago & I still have not seen issue #2 (that one did a much better job of telling me a complete story fragment in the 1st issue, though).
While I'd love to see more, The Test absolutely did not stand on it's own, so I'd have to give it a 3/5 as a "Pilot" issue.