This is the place to discuss the episodes of the Comic Book Page podcast, the Comic Book Page website or pretty much anything else of interest to the Comic Book Page community...
spid wrote:What you are labeling as misleading I would label a misdirection.
Is that really any better?
Some people might (and in the past have) argue that if it sells the particular issue then that is all that matters.
I tend to disagree with focusing on the short term at the expense of the long term. Misleading covers results in readers not trusting the covers which renders them ineffective as a marketing tool. That seems like a bad thing to me.
Agree. Never good to "fool" your customer
spid wrote:
Perry wrote:
spid wrote:What you are labeling as misleading I would label a misdirection.
Is that really any better?
Not in my eyes. One plays upon your expectations to provide you a cool twist on what you thought you were going to get. The other could be called a lie. Where the line rides is up to the reader.
I think there is a huge difference between having a "twist" and highlighting something that doesn't happen at all. I mean, if they were to show X-23 and Darkhawk fighting and then reveal it was never Darkhawk but some other hero/villain/hologram/clone/robot or just a dream sequence, then that is a decent twist on the cover. 'Oh, ya got me!'. But to have what is shown on the cover, NOT be in the book, is nothing but a lie.
I think I appreciate a good misdirection, I wouldn't necessarily think Clone/Robot as a good misdirection, more than a cover that tells me everything that is going on in the story based on the cover.
spid wrote:I think I appreciate a good misdirection, I wouldn't necessarily think Clone/Robot as a good misdirection, more than a cover that tells me everything that is going on in the story based on the cover.
I don't mean it should tell you the entire story, but a cover should do two things:
1) Get you to pick it up (of course)
2) Highlight one aspect of the story, giving you a glimpse of whats in-store for you if you choose to buy it.
Having just one is a failure, to me, for the company.
Of course, I understand if you like the bait and switch, it can have its strong points.
I do prefer the old timey covers where stuff was happening. Even if it is not directly mirrored in the book itself (fake-out, duplicates, etc). I am not sure if it partly nostalgia or what but the iconic pose type cover just doesn't do anything for me anymore. I am usually there on Wednesday looking at the new books and want them to speak to me. On a side note, that Marvel Now banner is far too large. It is not pleasing to my eye but it does catch it.
