Marvel.1 or Marvel.What?
Moderator: JohnMayo
It's obviously just a way to get collectors and most readers to buy another issue. If they were really concerned about making a jumping on point, then why wouldn't they release a one-shot called "Amazing Spider-Man Recap" or something. In One More Day they had an unbelievably good write-up of Spider-Man's history from the beginning all the way to One More Day. Reprint that even though it was all text. Or better yet, since they care about money so much, make a mini-series and illustrate that recap.
And actually, there was a free Spider-man Saga comic a month ago or so, didn't that recap everything as well? Do the same for all the titles and you're done.
The only reason to make this jump on point "654.1" is to make it seem like part of the series so collectors and readers [who don't need a recap] will buy it anyway.
And actually, there was a free Spider-man Saga comic a month ago or so, didn't that recap everything as well? Do the same for all the titles and you're done.
The only reason to make this jump on point "654.1" is to make it seem like part of the series so collectors and readers [who don't need a recap] will buy it anyway.
-
- Special Reviewer
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:54 am
- Location: Southampton, UK
I just noticed the April .1 solicitations. And Marvel really are making a mockery out of the "jumping on" situation.
If you want a great jumping on point for Secret Avengers, wouldn't Brubaker be the best candidate for writer, rather than Nick Spencer.
I also have an issue with the .1 branding. Surely by having two of the same issue numbers on the shelf in one month, people will think its a variant.
If you want a great jumping on point for Secret Avengers, wouldn't Brubaker be the best candidate for writer, rather than Nick Spencer.
I also have an issue with the .1 branding. Surely by having two of the same issue numbers on the shelf in one month, people will think its a variant.
Or that maybe the #x.1 is a revised and lessy buggy version of the #x issue?Paul Nolan wrote:I just noticed the April .1 solicitations. And Marvel really are making a mockery out of the "jumping on" situation.
If you want a great jumping on point for Secret Avengers, wouldn't Brubaker be the best candidate for writer, rather than Nick Spencer.
I also have an issue with the .1 branding. Surely by having two of the same issue numbers on the shelf in one month, people will think its a variant.
As I've mentioned on the podcast, I think this entire think is a *huge* mistake in the long term.
-
- Special Reviewer
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:54 am
- Location: Southampton, UK
Looking at the cover dress to Iron Man 500.1 there is nothing that says easy access to the reader, there is nothing that draws new readers towards it, there is nothing that really differentiates from a standard issue.
This is looking more a more like an excuse to get an extra issue on the shelves in the year.
Marvel Point-'less'?
This is looking more a more like an excuse to get an extra issue on the shelves in the year.
Marvel Point-'less'?
What do you mean? Everyone knows if you see ".1" it means you can get this and easily understand it. Hence, the popularity of "Learning Calculus.1" and "Understanding Advanced Astrophysics.1".Paul Nolan wrote:Looking at the cover dress to Iron Man 500.1 there is nothing that says easy access to the reader, there is nothing that draws new readers towards it, there is nothing that really differentiates from a standard issue.
-
- Master Reviewer
- Posts: 5522
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 7:44 pm
I wish I could say I'm surprised, but it just seems to be another example of the utter cluelessness of Marvel marketing.......
You're right, if the whole point of a point-1 is as a jumping on point, there should be SOME cover-dress to indicate this to a casual browser in the comic shop that tells them to "start here" and make it look different from being just another generic Iron Man cover.
You're right, if the whole point of a point-1 is as a jumping on point, there should be SOME cover-dress to indicate this to a casual browser in the comic shop that tells them to "start here" and make it look different from being just another generic Iron Man cover.
Is it just me or does it seem like Marvel is just throwing s**t at the wall and waiting for something to stick? This .1 thing is just that. Thumbing through the Marvel previews this month...I found absolutely nothing of interest. It's sad really. Hope somebody turns it around.BobBretall wrote:I wish I could say I'm surprised, but it just seems to be another example of the utter cluelessness of Marvel marketing.......
-
- Master Reviewer
- Posts: 5522
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 7:44 pm
I agree that their marketing does not have a clue, but saying they publish nothing of interest is a bit harsh. While perhaps true for you, I'm guessing maybe you were never a very big fan of Marvel in the first place.Cromics wrote: Is it just me or does it seem like Marvel is just throwing s**t at the wall and waiting for something to stick? This .1 thing is just that. Thumbing through the Marvel previews this month...I found absolutely nothing of interest. It's sad really. Hope somebody turns it around.
They were my entry point into comics and while they do a lot of stuff that pisses me off, they also still have some pretty good books coming out each month.
-
- Special Reviewer
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:54 am
- Location: Southampton, UK
found at http://www.comicsbeat.com/2010/11/04/ex ... e-on-hulk/
Quote by Marvel's Sr. Vice President Sales & Circulation David Gabriel
"The Point One stuff is not a theme but it’s trying to get more readers back into the stores."
Quote by Marvel's Sr. Vice President Sales & Circulation David Gabriel
"The Point One stuff is not a theme but it’s trying to get more readers back into the stores."
So how are they marketing these .1 issues to readers not in the stores?Paul Nolan wrote:found at http://www.comicsbeat.com/2010/11/04/ex ... e-on-hulk/
Quote by Marvel's Sr. Vice President Sales & Circulation David Gabriel
"The Point One stuff is not a theme but it’s trying to get more readers back into the stores."
Yes, sorry. I should have prefaced that with "I am not much of a Marvel reader". So mine is the casual Marvel fan's opinion.BobBretall wrote:I agree that their marketing does not have a clue, but saying they publish nothing of interest is a bit harsh. While perhaps true for you, I'm guessing maybe you were never a very big fan of Marvel in the first place.Cromics wrote: Is it just me or does it seem like Marvel is just throwing s**t at the wall and waiting for something to stick? This .1 thing is just that. Thumbing through the Marvel previews this month...I found absolutely nothing of interest. It's sad really. Hope somebody turns it around.
They were my entry point into comics and while they do a lot of stuff that pisses me off, they also still have some pretty good books coming out each month.
-
- Master Reviewer
- Posts: 5522
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 7:44 pm
Sure, an indication on the cover would help but even that doesn't work for people not in the stores to see the covers.BobBretall wrote:Yes, one would imagine if you're trying to reach a non-comic store audience you'd want to have some indication on the comic itself that it's a "staring point for new readers".......JohnMayo wrote: So how are they marketing these .1 issues to readers not in the stores?